International Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Research

Print ISSN: 2394-6369

Online ISSN: 2394-6377


International Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Research (IJCBR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific journals, research content, providing professional’s more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 59

PDF Downloaded: 30

Vishwanath, Vibha C, Krishna, and Shanker J: A study of pre-analytical errors in the clinical biochemistry laboratory at Victoria hospital, BMCRI, Bangalore


The laboratory medicine plays a pivotal role in the promotive, curative and preventive aspects of a nation's health delivery system. For reliable laboratory service; it is necessary to execute standard practices at all levels to guarantee the best possible care for the patients. Clinical laboratory testing process comprises of three broad phases: Pre-analytical, Analytical & Post Analytical. Out of the three phases, the pre-analytical phase is accountable for up to two-thirds of the errors. This study was conducted to enumerate the different errors taking place in the pre-analytical phase and their frequency so that corrective measures can be taken to remove them.


A prospective observational study was conducted in the clinical Biochemistry laboratory at Victoria Hospital attached to Bangalore Medical College & Research Institute, without direct interaction with the patients for 2 months from 1st May 2019 to 30th June 2019. Venous blood samples and their lab request forms received for routine clinical chemistry analysis were screened for pre-analytical errors by visual inspection.

Types of inappropriateness were evaluated as follows:

  1. Hemolysed samples,

  2. Insufficient sample volume,

  3. Improperly labeled samples (wrong vial/wrong slip),

  4. Clotted samples, &

  5. Lipemic samples

When any of the above-mentioned error occurs, entries are made in problem notification log book. The data generated was reviewed daily.


The total number of samples received in 2 months was 12880.

Of this, Outpatient samples were 9192 and Inpatient samples were 3688.

The distribution of different types of errors observed is given in the Table 1.

Table 1

S No.

Pre-analytical error

Frequency in Inpatient samples

Frequency in Outpatient samples

Total Frequency







Insufficient Volume





Improperly labeled samples





Lipemic samples





Clotted samples








Total errors detected were 169. Hemolysis constituted the majority of errors accounting for 0.43% of the total number of samples received. The next commonly encountered error was of insufficient sample volume, which constituted 0.39% of errors. Other pre-analytical errors observed includes sample with insufficient information (0.27%), lipemic samples(0.15%) and clotted samples(0.05%).

Figure 1


Clinical laboratory testing plays a crucial role in the diagnosis, prevention of disease, treatment, and monitoring of patients. Hence for better patient care, the performance of high-quality analysis is also critical.1 Patient preparation, sample collection, sample transportation, sample preparation, and sample storage (until the analysis), are the pre-analytical steps, which are the major error sources in laboratory diagnostics.2 Laboratory professionals mainly focused on analytical errors and mistakes in the past. However, the recent concentration is more on the pre-analytical and post-analytical steps due to the increased frequency of the errors.3

The term pre-analytical phase was coined by Statland and Winkel in 1977 and then influence and inference factors were included in the terminology of laboratory medicine.4 Since the pre-analytical phase step is mainly performed by the staff working outside the laboratory, it is difficult to manage and evaluate quality in this phase.5

Hemolysis constituted the most frequent pre-analytical error in our study. Most causes of in vitro hemolysis are related to specimen collection. Hemolysis of samples occurs when blood is forced through a fine needle, shaking the tubes vigorously, and centrifuging the sample specimen before clotting is complete.6 In vitro hemolysis during specimen collection can cause inaccurate laboratory test results by contaminating the surrounding plasma with the contents of hemolyzed red blood cells. For example, the concentration of potassium inside red blood cells is much higher than in the plasma and so an elevated potassium level is usually found in biochemistry tests of hemolyzed blood. Experience and proper technique are key for any phlebotomist, nurse or doctor to prevent hemolysis.7

Blood collection tubes contain specific quantities and types of additives. They are designed to collect a predetermined quantity of blood in order to achieve a defined concentration of additive in the blood sample, that is, a correct blood to additive ratio. An incorrect blood to additive ratio can lead to inaccurate test results and flawed patient management.8 The main reasons behind error due to insufficient sample volume are difficult sampling as in patients with chronic, debilitating diseases, pediatric patients and patients having thin veins. The practice of skilful phlebotomy techniques can reduce such errors to a minimum.9

A common cause of clotted EDTA samples is improper mixing of sample tubes after collection. This is often an avoidable event, overcome by inverting the tube 8-10 times immediately after collection to mix the blood thoroughly with the EDTA. These should be gentle inversions, avoiding rigorous shaking. When this is done correctly, the coagulation cascade is blocked, eliminating the possibility of clot formation and these samples then remain stable (suitable for analysis) for up to 24 hours. It is also observed that when syringes are used to collect blood samples into EDTA tubes, they are sometimes over-filled, leaving too little or no air-space that will enable proper mixing during inversions. Inappropriate ‘order of draw’, prolonged venepuncture episodes and mixing-up of sample tube caps (when they are taken off for syringe blood collection method) are also common factors that we have observed to contribute to these events.10

Also, mislabeled, unlabeled, or incompletely labeled specimens present potential serious harm to patients. Labeling errors can lead to possible serious misinterpretation of test results when specimens with similar identifying information enter an environment where thousands of specimens are handled each day and results must be accurately associated with the patient among the many.


In order to produce results that provide monitoring and diagnostic value, it is essential that the in-vivo state of our patient remains represented in the blood sample, as at the time of collection from the body. Practitioners tasked with collecting blood samples must be appropriately trained, competent and always follow their local standard operating procedures with respect to venepuncture. Immediate and adequate mixing of the blood sample and the EDTA is critical to avoid the formation of clots.

Proper specimen collection, handling, labeling and transport are essential for accurate laboratory results. Automation and technology can affect significant change in minimizing these types of errors, but staff training and open communication provide equally important opportunities for quality improvement. Consistent staff training and competency evaluation also play a major part in reducing pre-analytical errors.

Source of Funding


Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.



P Bonini M Plebani F Ceriotti F Rubboli Errors in laboratory medicineClin Chem2002485691810.1093/clinchem/48.5.691


M Plebani Quality indicators to detect pre-analytical errors in laboratory testingClin Biochem Rev2012333858


P Carraro M Plebani Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years laterClin Chem200753713384210.1373/clinchem.2007.088344


BE Statland P Winkel Effects of pre-analytical factors on the intraindividual variation of analytes in the blood of healthy subjects: consideration of preparation of the subject and time of venipunctureCRC Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci1977821054410.3109/10408367709151694


M Plebani L Sciacovelli A Aita ML Chiozza Harmonization of pre-analytical quality indicatorsBiochem Med20141511051310.11613/BM.2014.012


P Carraro G Servidio M Plebani Hemolyzed specimens: a reason for rejection or a clinical challengeClin Chem20004623067


MM Faghih MK Sharp Modeling and prediction of flow-induced hemolysis: a reviewBiomech Model Mechanobiol201918484581


CLSI (formerly NCCLS) document H1-A5. Tubes and Additives for Venous Blood Specimen Collection; Approved Standard – Fifth Edition. (ISBN 1-56238-519-4). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087-1898 USA, 200


R Chawla B Goswami D Tayal V Mallika Identification of the types of pre-analytical errors in the clinical chemistry laboratory: 1-year study at GB Pant HospitalLab Med20104128992


G Moore G Knight Blann Fundamentals of Biomedical Science: Haematology. Oxford: Oxford University Press


© This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Article type

Original Article

Article page


Authors Details

H L Vishwanath, Vibha C, Muralidhara Krishna, Sreeja Shanker J*

Article History

Received : 26-06-2021

Accepted : 07-09-2021

Available online : 05-01-2022

Article Metrics

View Article As


Downlaod Files


Open Abstract (Increase article citation) Wiki in hindi